175 results for 'cat:"Tort" AND cat:"Negligence"'.
J. Huffaker grants, in part, the medical device maker’s motion to dismiss a product liability suit filed by a patient who claims that her Smart Port, implanted for the purpose of infusion therapy was defective. She alleges claims under the Alabama Extended Manufacturer’s Liability Doctrine as well as claims for negligence, breach of warranty and wantonness concerning the device’s catheter, which fractured near her heart. The patient’s claims have an articulated reasonable set of facts that could make the medical device maker’s liable for failure to warn. Therefore, the AEMLD, negligence and wantonness claims may proceed, and the patient concedes her warranty claim.
Court: USDC Middle District of Alabama, Judge: Huffaker, Filed On: April 23, 2024, Case #: 2:24cv112, NOS: Personal Injury - Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury/Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: tort, negligence, Product Liability
J. Moon grants the landlord's motion to dismiss negligence claims. A tenant suffering from multiple disabilities, including bipolar disorder, severe PTSD, depression, anxiety, and a cracked skull, acquired two service dogs that reduce the effects of her disabilities. The landlord told the tenant she could not have dogs resembling pit bulls, but she did not get rid of them because she needed them to manage her disability; they were not pit bulls, and her neighbors were not abiding by a “no pets” policy. Actionable negligence requires that there must be a legal duty, a breach of that duty and resulting injury that could have been reasonably foreseen by the exercise of reasonable care and under Virginia law, tort claims cannot be rooted in violation of a contractual duty.
Court: USDC Western District of Virginia, Judge: Moon , Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 3:24cv6, Categories: Landlord Tenant, tort, negligence
Per curiam, the appellate division finds that the lower court properly found for Swarovski in a trip and fall suit stemming from a woman's fall over a sign on the sidewalk outside the Brooklyn Museum of Art advertising a fashion event sponsored by the jewelry company. There is no evidence Swarovski had any control or occupancy of the property abutting the sidewalk where the accident occurred. Affirmed.
Court: New York Appellate Divisions, Judge: Per curiam, Filed On: April 17, 2024, Case #: 02062, Categories: tort, negligence
J. Sessions denies Monsanto, Bayer and two other companies’ motion to dismiss a misrepresentation claim brought by four teachers and a student, who say the companies’ polychlorinated biphenyls are contaminating school buildings, as well as a husband’s claim for loss of consortium due to his wife’s injuries. The ag giants are not entitled to dismissal because the plaintiffs plausibly alleged justifiable reliance on the companies’ representations.
Court: USDC Vermont, Judge: Sessions, Filed On: April 12, 2024, Case #: 2:23cv272, NOS: Personal Injury - Product Liability - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Environment, tort, negligence
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Whitney partially grants a husband and wife’s motion to alter judgment in this personal injury case against the husband’s former employer, a farm and its owner. Previously, the court ruled in favor of the husband, who had been injured on the job, and his wife, for the farm’s negligence and the wife’s loss of consortium for over $2 million. The husband and wife are correct to say they are owed post-judgment interest, which is now awarded.
Court: USDC Western District of North Carolina, Judge: Whitney, Filed On: April 10, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv413, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Employment, tort, negligence
J. Boyle denies a mall property owner’s and security firm’s motions to transfer the venue of this case to the Middle District of North Carolina; the suit involves negligence claims brought by a patron who was shot in the crossfire during a robbery. The owner and firm, both foreign entities, claim that the patron fraudulently added the North Carolinian armed robbers to this action, but they have failed to demonstrate this. This case is remanded to Durham County Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Court: USDC Eastern District of North Carolina, Judge: Boyle, Filed On: April 8, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv210, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: tort, negligence, Jurisdiction
J. Toliver granted a motion to dismiss negligent hiring, training and retention claims made by a motorist who was hit by a tractor-trailer when it crossed over the highway centerline. The motorist did not provide evidence that the employer had failed to provide training beyond what a potential employee might be reasonably expected to know, such as the basic rules of the road. The motorist is granted leave to amend.
Court: USDC Northern District of Texas , Judge: Toliver, Filed On: April 5, 2024, Case #: 3:24cv114, NOS: Motor Vehicle - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Employment, tort, negligence
J. Dick denies pre-trial requests by nine litigants to exclude evidence of drug use by two welders killed in a Louisiana paper mill explosion in 2017. The decedents are not involved in a negligence suit against the owners of the mill, where three workers were killed and seven others injured by the blast during “hot work” activities near a flammable tank. The evidence of drugs on the two men who also tested positive for drug use in post-mortem exams is material to the issue of what caused the deadly accident.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: Dick, Filed On: April 3, 2024, Case #: 3:18cv613, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: tort, negligence, Discovery
J. Gruber finds the circuit court properly found for the homeowners on an invitee's allegations the lack of a railing on the home's second floor balcony caused him to fall from the balcony, sustaining injuries. The invitee knew of the dangerous condition that caused his injury, and no evidence shown brings into question any material fact. Affirmed.
Court: Arkansas Court Of Appeals, Judge: Gruber, Filed On: April 3, 2024, Case #: CV-22-202, Categories: Evidence, tort, negligence
J. Lewis grants the amusement parks' motion for summary judgment. The inspector whose hand was amputated during an inspection says park employees operated the apparatus at an unsafe speed during inspection, causing the amputation. The inspector has stated he was trained to touch a wire rope, but not told where to position himself, nor of a designated safe operating speed. The injured party has failed to establish duty of care and proximate cause for his negligence claim against the company.
Court: USDC South Carolina Aiken, Judge: Lewis, Filed On: March 25, 2024, Case #: 0:22cv1114, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: tort, negligence
J. Kobayashi partially denies dismissal on part of a claim against the government by military families regarding the military’s handling of the Red Hill fuel leak and subsequent water crisis. The government must face part of a negligence claim that accuses the government of not following protocols for flushing the fuel contamination from the families’ homes, as the government did not establish how following the protocols may have implicated other policy concerns. On the other hand, because the government did show how its failure to remediate constituted a discretionary decision under an exception under the Federal Torts Claims Act, that tort claim is dismissed with prejudice.
Court: USDC Hawaii, Judge: Kobayashi, Filed On: March 21, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv397, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Government, tort, negligence
J. Ortego affirms the allocation of fault and damage awards in an auto accident case involving a car/ambulance collision. The dash cam video from the ambulance, photographs and expert testimony support the allocation of 40% fault to the ambulance driver and 60% fault to his employer. Affirmed.
Court: Louisiana Court Of Appeal, Judge: Ortego, Filed On: March 20, 2024, Case #: CA-23-601, Categories: tort, Damages, negligence
J. Flaum finds that the lower court properly dismissed a worker's lawsuit against a barge company stemming from his slip and fall on ice on the deck of a barge, leaving him in the freezing February waters of the Mississippi River for 12 minutes. The complaint fails to connect his fall with any breach of duty owed to him by by the barge company, as his injury was not foreseeable. Affirmed.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: Flaum, Filed On: March 19, 2024, Case #: 22-2348, Categories: tort, negligence
J. Armstead affirms the lower court's order granting the municipality summary judgment in the resident's suit claiming it is partially responsible for injuries she sustained from a fall when her foot was caught in wire wrapped around a pole owned by a church where the wire extended onto a defective portion of the adjacent sidewalk. The resident failed to demonstrate the city knew the wire was a hazard since there was never any prior reported problem in the 10 years since it was put there, and she had in the previous year walked along that portion of sidewalk without incident. Affirmed.
Court: West Virginia Supreme Court Of Appeals, Judge: Armstead, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 22-625, Categories: Government, tort, negligence
J. Coulson grants, in part, Tractor Supply’s motion for summary judgment in this personal injury suit brought by a married couple. The husband who was employed by a third-party logistics company as a freight handler was injured when a third-party staffing company employee ran into him with a pallet jack. The couple claims vicarious negligence, negligent entrustment, negligent hiring, retention, and supervision and loss of consortium. Tractor Supply argues they did not employ either of the third-party employees, but a reasonable jury could find that the staffing company employee was in fact employed by being on the premises. The couples’ negligence claims are dismissed for lack of a genuine dispute. The parties shall confer and inform the court if they will or will not participate in a settlement conference regarding Tractor Supply’s third-party complaint against the staffing company employee for discovery.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Coulson, Filed On: March 15, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv1078, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: tort, negligence, Discovery
J. Hoyle finds the trial court properly ruled in favor of the dog attack victim. Though the dogs were kept on adjoining properties, and there were questions as to who was in actual possession of them as well as who controlled the property, the jury found certain property owners to share in certain percentages of negligence. One of the owners, however, lacked superior ability to control the property, and the evidence is legally insufficient to support a finding of negligence as to this owner. Reversed in part.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Hoyle , Filed On: March 13, 2024, Case #: 12-22-00297-CV, Categories: Property, tort, negligence
J. Pearson denies, in part, Norfolk Southern's motion to dismiss, ruling claims brought by residents of East Palestine are not preempted by federal law because the claims involved in the train derailment either involve conduct not covered by federal law or seek damages for a breach of safety regulations. Additionally, Norfolk Southern's transport of more than a million pounds of hazardous chemicals and intentionally setting them on fire in a residential neighborhood following the derailment constitute "abnormally dangerous activity" and establishes a claim for strict liability.
Court: USDC Northern District of Ohio, Judge: Pearson, Filed On: March 13, 2024, Case #: 4:23cv242, NOS: Other Personal Injury - Torts - Personal Injury, Categories: Environment, tort, negligence
J. Miskel finds that the lower court properly denied the appellant company's dismissal motion in this personal injury lawsuit stemming from an industrial accident, in which the appellee was allegedly injured while performing repair work at a recycling plant. The company sought dismissal based on a failure to file a certificate of merit pursuant to chapter 150, but the lower court did not abuse its discretion with the ruling. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Miskel, Filed On: March 13, 2024, Case #: 05-23-00219-CV, Categories: Civil Procedure, tort, negligence
J. Stewart finds the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the subsea oil drilling engineering and exploration firm. The employee says he sustained injuries to his shoulder and neck while servicing a remotely operated vehicle onboard a drillship during a Chevron contract. He brings claims under theories of negligence and unseaworthiness. The trial court correctly held the employee is not a seaman as defined by his Jones Act claim, and he did not establish a genuine dispute of material fact as to negligence and unseaworthiness. Affirmed.
Court: 5th Circuit, Judge: Stewart , Filed On: March 12, 2024, Case #: 23-20095, Categories: Maritime, tort, negligence
J. Darby finds the trial court properly entered summary judgment in favor of Cessna. After the pilots were injured in a plane crash, they filed a negligence suit against Cessna alleging the company failed to revise its service manual to include a new part and installation instructions. The claim is subject to the General Aviation Revitalization Act's statute of repose. Cessna did not add or omit anything to the service manual that was a proximate cause of the accident in order to restart the statute. Affirmed.
Court: Oklahoma Supreme Court, Judge: Darby , Filed On: March 12, 2024, Case #: 121,203, Categories: tort, negligence, Aviation
J. Suddaby enters judgment in favor of a Syracuse police officer on a citizen’s claims for excessive force and failure to intervene, dismissing the entire complaint. He alleges the officer used unreasonable force to restrain him on suspicions that he inserted contraband into his rectum while being detained in a holding cell. He also alleges he was restrained both physically and medically at a local hospital and was forced to undergo a sigmoidoscopy in an effort to retrieve the contraband. Video surveillance shows the officer had not used unreasonable force during these events. The officer also successfully alleges that he was not involved in the hospital’s decision to sedate him or the order to perform the medical procedure.
Court: USDC Northern District of New York, Judge: Suddaby, Filed On: March 5, 2024, Case #: 5:20cv1215, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: tort, negligence, Police Misconduct
J. Johnston denies the roofing contractor's motion to dismiss the property management company's beach of contract suit claiming the negligence of the contractor's employees caused a new roof they were installing on the building leased by U-Haul to catch fire, eventually destroying the entire building. The contractor's argument using the West Virginia's "gist of the action doctrine" is unpersuasive, as the West Virginia Supreme Court has long recognized "an independent duty - sounding in tort - to prevent and mitigate accidental fires...[that] exists entirely independent of the parties’ contractual relationship."
Court: USDC Southern District of West Virginia, Judge: Johnston, Filed On: February 29, 2024, Case #: 5:23cv339, NOS: Other Contract - Contract, Categories: tort, negligence, Contract
[Consolidated.] J. Rochford finds that the lower court improperly found for Motorola on negligence claims stemming from the plaintiffs' fathers' exposure to reproductively toxic chemicals at their employment, allegedly causing their children to be born with severe birth defects. There is a genuine issue of fact as to whether Motorola's health policy actually increased its employees' risk of child birth defects, as well as the feasibility of the plaintiffs' expert's proposed recommendations as to how the company should guard against injuries to its workers' unborn children. Reversed.
Court: Illinois Appellate Court, Judge: Rochford, Filed On: February 29, 2024, Case #: 220884, Categories: Employment, tort, negligence